<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Layered Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.layeredthoughts.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com</link>
	<description>Ideas on Business, Startups, SEO, Linkbuilding, Programming, Automation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:11:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Should I Blog About? by tomaszjot</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/general/what-should-i-blog-about/comment-page-1#comment-27030</link>
		<dc:creator>tomaszjot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=312#comment-27030</guid>
		<description>In one of the post on WF you mentioned combining SEO and PPC for gaining traffic. It looks risky to me but I would like to try. If you could cover the topic one day it would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of the post on WF you mentioned combining SEO and PPC for gaining traffic. It looks risky to me but I would like to try. If you could cover the topic one day it would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Difference Between Broad, Phrase, and Exact Match Search Volume Data by vikesh swami</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/keyword-research/the-difference-between-broad-phrase-and-exact-match-search-volume-data/comment-page-1#comment-23195</link>
		<dc:creator>vikesh swami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=160#comment-23195</guid>
		<description>Hello,

 I am also confused about this topic but now i understood what is the exactly means. Thanks for nice post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p> I am also confused about this topic but now i understood what is the exactly means. Thanks for nice post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interpreting the Market Samurai SEO Competition Module Data by Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/keyword-research/interpreting-the-market-samurai-seo-competition-module-data/comment-page-1#comment-22621</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=17#comment-22621</guid>
		<description>Just found this article, and it&#039;s exactly what I was looking for. I&#039;ve been trying to work out what this SEO lark is about, found Market Samurai earlier today, and now I have a decent guide to how I can exploit it. 

One quick question - which of the above categories is &quot;most important&quot; if you can pick one? Each MS search profile is different and I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a bit of an art to knowing which is the best to take down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found this article, and it&#8217;s exactly what I was looking for. I&#8217;ve been trying to work out what this SEO lark is about, found Market Samurai earlier today, and now I have a decent guide to how I can exploit it. </p>
<p>One quick question &#8211; which of the above categories is &#8220;most important&#8221; if you can pick one? Each MS search profile is different and I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a bit of an art to knowing which is the best to take down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Competitors Are Awesome You Dummy by Rob Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/startups/competitors-are-awesome-you-dummy/comment-page-1#comment-21668</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=328#comment-21668</guid>
		<description>I agree, competition breeds innovation. The only thing that kills me is when competitors do nothing but copy, and you&#039;re stuck innovating heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, competition breeds innovation. The only thing that kills me is when competitors do nothing but copy, and you&#8217;re stuck innovating heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Project Clients Vs. Product Customers &#8211; How To Maintain Sanity By Building Products by Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/startups/project-clients-vs-product-customers-how-to-maintain-sanity-by-building-products/comment-page-1#comment-20356</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=343#comment-20356</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed this post Darrin. Good to see I&#039;m not alone in my client-directed ire. I maintain my sanity by refusing to meet with new prospects who want to ask questions and cutting off tire-kickers as soon as I sniff &#039;em out.

I disagree with you saying 99% of clients are one-timers, it doesn&#039;t work that way for me at least, and there are many instances of advertising agencies who have managed clients accounts for decades.

Anyway, enjoying your blog, hope all is well... D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed this post Darrin. Good to see I&#8217;m not alone in my client-directed ire. I maintain my sanity by refusing to meet with new prospects who want to ask questions and cutting off tire-kickers as soon as I sniff &#8216;em out.</p>
<p>I disagree with you saying 99% of clients are one-timers, it doesn&#8217;t work that way for me at least, and there are many instances of advertising agencies who have managed clients accounts for decades.</p>
<p>Anyway, enjoying your blog, hope all is well&#8230; D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Once Again, Google Proves They Don&#8217;t Care About Publishers by John</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/seo-link-building/once-again-google-proves-they-dont-care-about-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-19909</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=351#comment-19909</guid>
		<description>Any idea if this only affects searches that originate from Google.com? As in, will this also affect searches from Chrome&#039;s omnibar, or the Firefox browser search field?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea if this only affects searches that originate from Google.com? As in, will this also affect searches from Chrome&#8217;s omnibar, or the Firefox browser search field?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Once Again, Google Proves They Don&#8217;t Care About Publishers by Matt Rhys-Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/seo-link-building/once-again-google-proves-they-dont-care-about-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-19775</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rhys-Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=351#comment-19775</guid>
		<description>Previously thought this was hype when I first read in a daze yesterday, but when put like this - fair point.

I remember reading a few weeks ago about Facebook limiting company page post showing in user feeds. 

Looks like we&#039;re all slowly being pushed down the funnel - I can see the end in sight where EVERYTHING must be paid for in £s / $s rather than effort and skill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previously thought this was hype when I first read in a daze yesterday, but when put like this &#8211; fair point.</p>
<p>I remember reading a few weeks ago about Facebook limiting company page post showing in user feeds. </p>
<p>Looks like we&#8217;re all slowly being pushed down the funnel &#8211; I can see the end in sight where EVERYTHING must be paid for in £s / $s rather than effort and skill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Once Again, Google Proves They Don&#8217;t Care About Publishers by Nathaniel Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/seo-link-building/once-again-google-proves-they-dont-care-about-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-19763</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=351#comment-19763</guid>
		<description>I can’t seem to edit my post, but here’s are two links that you can use to test it yourself:
Non SSL: http://coios.net/test/
SSL: https://secure.coios.net/test/ It’s an extremely simple test, but if you don’t have access to a domain with HTTPS, it can be a hassle. You can use localhost (with and without SSL) to test the referral.

(sorry, messed up a link with my previous comment)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can’t seem to edit my post, but here’s are two links that you can use to test it yourself:<br />
Non SSL: <a href="http://coios.net/test/" rel="nofollow">http://coios.net/test/</a><br />
SSL: <a href="https://secure.coios.net/test/" rel="nofollow">https://secure.coios.net/test/</a> It’s an extremely simple test, but if you don’t have access to a domain with HTTPS, it can be a hassle. You can use localhost (with and without SSL) to test the referral.</p>
<p>(sorry, messed up a link with my previous comment)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Once Again, Google Proves They Don&#8217;t Care About Publishers by Nathaniel Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/seo-link-building/once-again-google-proves-they-dont-care-about-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-19760</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=351#comment-19760</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t wait, so I tested it now on Chrome 14.0.835.202 (latest stable), IE 9.0.8112 and Firefox 6.0.2 the results are the same for all:

HTTP to HTTP: Referer sent.
HTTP to HTTPS: Referer sent.
HTTPS to HTTP: Referer not sent.
HTTPS to HTTPS: Referer sent.

Now I&#039;m not sure about Opera sending the referer in every single case, and I can&#039;t test it at the moment, but it should at least send referers from HTTPS to HTTPS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t wait, so I tested it now on Chrome 14.0.835.202 (latest stable), IE 9.0.8112 and Firefox 6.0.2 the results are the same for all:</p>
<p>HTTP to HTTP: Referer sent.<br />
HTTP to HTTPS: Referer sent.<br />
HTTPS to HTTP: Referer not sent.<br />
HTTPS to HTTPS: Referer sent.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not sure about Opera sending the referer in every single case, and I can&#8217;t test it at the moment, but it should at least send referers from HTTPS to HTTPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Once Again, Google Proves They Don&#8217;t Care About Publishers by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.layeredthoughts.com/seo-link-building/once-again-google-proves-they-dont-care-about-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-19757</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layeredthoughts.com/?p=351#comment-19757</guid>
		<description>Awesome, appreciate it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/46 queries in 0.506 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 829/844 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.layeredthoughts.com @ 2012-02-06 09:37:23 -->
